The financial world is witnessing a significant and perplexing shift concerning the volatility of exchange-traded funds, especially the currency ETFs, which have garnered a large degree of attention as they experience steep declines since the start of trading after the Spring FestivalThis sudden downturn closely follows an unusual spike in prices just before the festival, raising questions among investors and financial analysts alikeTo better appreciate these phenomena, it’s critical to delve into the market mechanics, investor behavior, and external factors that come into play.

Leading up to the Spring Festival, the currency ETFs were riding a wave of unprecedented upward momentum, some rallying by more than 9% in a single dayA notable peculiarity of this surge was the divergence of secondary market prices from the actual net asset value (NAV) of the funds, reaching premiums as high as 10%. This rapid inflation of prices within the currency ETF segment can be attributed to a combination of low market liquidity and smaller fund sizes, which made them susceptible to speculative trading by short-term investorsDisconcertingly, this created a surrogate bubble in ETF valuations, which investors anticipated would only continue to inflate until reality caught up.

However, as the market reopened after the festival, sentiment shifted dramaticallyThe euphoria was replaced by caution as investment funds clawed back, prompting public fund companies to release a series of risk alerts to their investors, warning of potential losses due to the recent exuberance in pricesWith the influx of cash quickly receding, these previously elevated prices plummeted back to more realistic valuations.

On February 6, the day following the latest trading resumption, several major currency ETFs like Huatai-PB Tianjin Gold ETF and Guoshou Currency ETF faced one-day maximum declinesThey observed a nearly 10% drop that wiped out months—if not years—of interest yield for investors who had bought at the peak

Advertisements

This turn of events also served as a wake-up call: investors realized they might have been caught up in a speculative frenzy rather than making sound investment decisions based on the funds' actual market merit.

Moreover, the dynamic nature of T+0 trading, which allows investors to buy and sell the same fund within a single trading day, adds another layer of complexitySome might view this mechanism as advantageous, enabling them to capitalize on short-term price movements to maximize liquidity and returnsYet, it can also magnify market volatility, leading traders into a high-stakes game resembling musical chairs—quick moves can produce immediate gains or catastrophic losses.

In this frantic environment, analysts, including Wang Fanglin from Morningstar, have pointed out that high premiums misguide investors about the true values of these ETFs, leading them to make ill-informed decisionsIncreasing volatility and dislocated pricing in securities can rupture the fundamental pricing efficiency of the markets, which investors rely on for establishing confidence in their transactions.

As for cross-border ETFs, the vitality of their performance starkly contrasts with the currency ETFs, presenting a less predictable environment altogetherOn February 5, the opening day after the Spring Festival, the Harvest Germany ETF had faced a significant downturn, leading to a staggering 21% drop cumulatively over just three daysWhile some leading ETFs have maintained high premiums in the market, it leads one to wonder about the underlying demand driving these prices against the backdrop of rising global uncertainties involving geopolitical issues and changing macroeconomic landscapes.

For instance, the Invesco Great Wall S&P Consumer Select ETF defied expectations, continuing to soar significantly even as other funds faced reality; its premium exceeded 40% as of February 6. Despite only modest growth in NAV over the previous three months, the secondary market pricing surged, raising eyebrows about investor sentiment and valuation fundamentals amidst uneven performance across various sectors.

Various factors influence these trends, from limited foreign exchange quotas restricting capital flow to stringent QDII fund regulations

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements